Search for: "Michael Stokes Paulsen"
Results 1 - 20
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 6:32 am
Rev. 71 (2001)∙ Michael Stokes Paulsen, Captain James T. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
" Six months ago, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen made headlines by publishing an article on SSRN, The Sweep and Force of Section Three, in which they argued that Donald Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021 qualified as an insurrection and that Section 3 therefore disqualified him from being elected President again. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:58 am
My article with Michael Stokes Paulsen about the continuing legal force and broad substantive sweep of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment has now been published in final form in the Penn Law Review. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
Professor Will Baude and Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, to their credit, made a point along the same lines. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Two scholars who are not here are William Baude of the University of Chicago law school and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:25 am
Will Baude Responds to Objections to his Section Three Article with Michael Stokes Paulsen qbaron Mon, 02/05/2024 - 09:25 Read more about Will Baude Responds to Objections to his Section Three Article with Michael Stokes Paulsen The Volokh Conspiracy Will Baude Michael Paulsen Fighting the Meaning of Section Three [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Meyer, The Recrudescent American Conservatism, in Bacevich, ed., American Conservatism: Reclaiming an Intellectual Tradition OPTIONAL READINGS 1) Michael Oakeshott, On Being Conservative, parts 1, 3, 4 (superb discussion of conservatism as a "disposition" and its relationship to politics) 2) Edmund Burke, Excerpts from Reflections on the Revolution in France; Letter to William Elliot, May 26, 1795 (canonical discussions of conservatism) 3) Francis Fukuyama, Liberalism and its… [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
, The Guardian (Dec. 29, 2023) Judge Luttig: Trump eligibility case ‘tests America’s commitment to its own democracy’, MSNBC (Dec. 23, 2023) Adam Liptak, An About-Face on Whether the 14th Amendment Bars Trump From Office, New York Times (Sept. 18, 2023) Noah Feldman, Alas, Trump Is Still Eligible to Run for Office, Bloomberg (Aug. 20, 2023) Baude, William and Paulsen, Michael Stokes, The Sweep and Force of Section Three (August 9, 2023). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:40 am
Efforts to rely on Section 3 to keep Trump off the ballot in 2024 gained momentum after the release in August of an upcoming article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review by two conservative law professors, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
Meanwhile, as Professors William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen have documented in a widely cited forthcoming article in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, there are other oddities of Griffin’s Case that make it a particularly poor authority on the meaning of Section 3.Trump’s team will lodge other objections. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 7:42 am
Three of them were with Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 1:16 pm
Participants included a variety of legal scholars and other experts, including Michael Stokes Paulsen (coauthor of a widely discussed article arguing Trump should be disqualified), Kurt Lash (author of an article cutting more the other way), VC blogger Josh Blackman (coauthor of an article defending Trump's eligibility), and myself. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Tribe and Luttig draw heavily on the analysis of Section 3 by two highly regarded conservative law professors, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen that is contained in a law review article to be published next year in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.Baude and Paulsen contend that Section 3 is crystal clear and means precisely what it says: “No person shall … hold any office … under the United States… [who] shall have… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:44 pm
In August, two prominent legal scholars who are members of the conservative judicial group the Federalist Society, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, suggested that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment clearly bars Trump from running for reelection. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 2:47 pm
Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen provide additional evidence to this effect in their important article on Trump and Section 3, which jump-started this entire debate. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
A draft law review article taking issue with Baude and Paulsen, co-written by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tilman, entitled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen makes a good case that what happened on January 6, 2021 was not an "insurrection" and that the Baude/Paulsen reading of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment is wrong. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 9:58 am
Will Baude Discusses Section Three in Part Two of Podcast qbaron Fri, 09/15/2023 - 11:58 Read more about Will Baude Discusses Section Three in Part Two of Podcast Amarica's Constitution The Two Experts, Part Two - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 9:11 am
Will Baude Discusses Section Three on Podcast qbaron Fri, 09/15/2023 - 11:11 Read more about Will Baude Discusses Section Three on Podcast Amarica's Constitution The Two Experts on Section Three - Special Guests William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:08 pm
" [Here, Amar was referring to his two earlier podcasts in which he interviewed Professors Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen.] [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 7:11 am
Via Josh Blackman (who has a new draft article with Seth Tillman disputing the originalist account that Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen offered on this question). [read post]
