Search for: "Michael Stokes Paulsen"
Results 121 - 140
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2023, 3:37 pm
. *** Baude, William and Paulsen, Michael Stokes, The Sweep and Force of Section Three (August 9, 2023). [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 2:59 am
Michigan] “Indispensable Remedy: The Broad Scope of the Constitution’s Impeachment Power” [Gene Healy, Cato white paper and video feature] Michael Stokes Paulsen series at Law and Liberty on impeachment and originalism [introduction, developing a principled constitutional basis for use of the power, digression on Aaron Burr, special considerations of impeaching judges and presidents; on original meaning of “high crimes and misdemeanors” in… [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 1:16 pm
Participants included a variety of legal scholars and other experts, including Michael Stokes Paulsen (coauthor of a widely discussed article arguing Trump should be disqualified), Kurt Lash (author of an article cutting more the other way), VC blogger Josh Blackman (coauthor of an article defending Trump's eligibility), and myself. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:53 am
” The article, written by William Baude of the University ion Chicago Law School, long known as a conservative law school, and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. [read post]
30 May 2009, 5:41 am
Schwartz, Religions of Star Trek (2008).Krauss, Lawrence, The Physics of Star Trek (rev. ed.)(2007).Marinaccio, Dave, All I Really Needed To Know I Learned From Watching Star Trek (1995).Paulsen, Michael Stokes, Captain James T. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
Back in 1995, two years after RFRA was passed and two years before it was partly invalidated in Boerne, Michael Stokes Paulsen published an excellent essay called A RFRA Runs Through It. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:58 am
[more: Michael Stokes Paulsen, Yale Law Journal, 1993] The result before long could be a face-off in which advocates claim the ERA has been duly adopted as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution, while others say it hasn’t. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:51 am
Franck of the National Review’s Bench Memos blog discusses a recent essay in Public Discourse by Michael Stokes Paulsen, explaining that the essay has persuaded him that the Chief Justice’s opinion in the health care cases was correct. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:51 am
Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen make the same argument in The Sweep and Force of Section Three, to be published in the Penn law review. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
Indeed, the scholarship of conservatives such as McConnell, Calabresi, Michael Stokes Paulsen, and Judge John T. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 9:15 am
The Center for Judicial Engagement’s Evan Bernick critiques a provocative proposal by Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
Michael Stokes Paulsen (who sometimes contributes to Balkinization) is cited as arguing, I believe correctly, that any Convention would have plenary authority to propose whatever it wished, including the parade of horribles. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:57 pm
The emphasized sentence comes not from Justice Scalia, but from Michael Stokes Paulsen's 2006 article, How to Interpret the Constitution (and how not to).Here is the full passage from Paulsen's article: Simply put: If the meaning of the words of the Constitution supplies a sufficiently determinate legal rule or standard applicable to the case at hand, that rule or standard must prevail over a contrary rule supplied by some other competing source of law… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:44 pm
In August, two prominent legal scholars who are members of the conservative judicial group the Federalist Society, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, suggested that Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment clearly bars Trump from running for reelection. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:03 am
Vasan Kesavan & Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Interpretive Force of the Constitution? [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 8:18 am
" Another such title was Michael Stokes Paulsen's "A RFRA Runs Through It," echoing the title of the movie "A River Runs Through It. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
A few developments in that case:First, a group of distinguished law professors, including Lillian BeVier (UVA), Rick Garnett (ND), Michael Stokes Paulsen (St. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 2:08 pm
Prominent conservative legal scholar Michael Stokes Paulsen, a leading academic expert on impeachment, rarely agrees on much of anything with famous liberal Harvard law Professor Laurence Tribe. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:52 am
(The most famous such study is Michael Stokes Paulsen, “Is Lloyd Bentsen Unconstitutional? [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 3:40 pm
” Vasan Kesavan and Michael Stokes Paulsen addressed the “amazingly complicated question of whether West Virginia is lawfully a State of the United States. [read post]
