Search for: "Michael Stokes Paulsen"
Results 141 - 160
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2010, 9:03 am
Vasan Kesavan & Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Interpretive Force of the Constitution? [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
A few developments in that case:First, a group of distinguished law professors, including Lillian BeVier (UVA), Rick Garnett (ND), Michael Stokes Paulsen (St. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
This question is the title of a provocative recent article by Michael Stokes Paulsen, who answers in the affirmative. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 5:59 pm
Here's the abstract: In a recent essay in the Yale Law Journal, constitutional law scholar Michael Stokes Paulsen argues... [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:31 pm
Here's the abstract: In a recent essay in the Yale Law Journal, constitutional law scholar Michael Stokes Paulsen argues that “[t]he force of international law, as a body of law, upon the United States is . . . largely an illusion. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:10 am
Here is the abstract: In a recent essay in the Yale Law Journal, constitutional law scholar Michael Stokes Paulsen argues that “[t]he force of international law, as a body of law, upon the United States is . . . largely an illusion. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:29 pm
Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:26 pm
Michael Stokes Paulsen (University of St. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:58 pm
Mattel litigation and manifest disregard, as well as responses by selected scholars to Michael Stokes Paulsen's The Constitutional Power To Interpret International Law (118 Yale L.J. 1762 (2009)). [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 10:30 am
by Julian Ku In the inaugural issue of the Yale Law Journal Online, the new online companion to the Yale Law Journal, Peggy McGuinness, Peter Spiro, Robert Ahdieh and I respond to Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen’s recent article: ”The Constitutional Power to Interpret International Law. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 4:02 am
From the abstract’s opening: This essay reply to Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, “The Constitutional Power to Interpret International Law,” 118 YALE L. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 12:07 am
Four authors respond to Michael Stokes Paulsen's The Constitutional Power To Interpret International Law, printed in Volume 118, Issue 8 of the Journal. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:12 pm
Here's the abstract:This essay reply to Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, "The Constitutional Power to Interpret International Law," 118 Yale L.J. 1774 (2009) argues that Paulsen's static, formalist portrait of the foreign affairs Constitution stands in stark contrast to the dynamic realities of transnational lawmaking today. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 9:56 am
Here is the abstract: This essay reply to Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, "The Constitutional Power to Interpret International Law," 118 YALE L. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 4:22 am
The Download of the Week is The Constitutional Power to Interpret International Law by Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:33 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen (University of St. [read post]
30 May 2009, 5:41 am
Schwartz, Religions of Star Trek (2008).Krauss, Lawrence, The Physics of Star Trek (rev. ed.)(2007).Marinaccio, Dave, All I Really Needed To Know I Learned From Watching Star Trek (1995).Paulsen, Michael Stokes, Captain James T. [read post]
29 May 2009, 10:05 am
Paulsen's forthcoming Yale Law Journal piece, which touches on the constitutional presidential power question, is here. [read post]
17 May 2009, 8:52 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen and Victoria Toensing outline possible defense strategies for the authors of the torture memos. [read post]
16 May 2009, 2:23 pm
According to law professor Michael Stokes Paulsen (fellow Balkinizer), the OLC lawyers who concluded that waterboarding is not "torture" did a bang up job. [read post]
