Search for: "Michigan Gas Storage Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 1:46 pm by WIMS
"       In a partial dissent, one Justice indicated, "The majority concludes that when the Kansas Companies used Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)-compliant accounting practices to allocate overhead to their mitigation efforts, they were dispositively entitled to recover the full amount of that overhead as damages. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
Clear Lam Packaging failed to have a hazardous waste storage permit, maintain aisle space in the hazardous waste storage area, keep hazardous waste containers closed, provide annual employee training and keep records about it, and have a complete contingency plan. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Supreme Court, on June 29, 2015, in a 5 to 4 ruling, held in Michigan v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
October 31,  2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Clear Lam Packaging failed to have a hazardous waste storage permit, maintain aisle space in the hazardous waste storage area, keep hazardous waste containers closed, provide annual employee training and keep records about it, and have a complete contingency plan. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
  We had also had concerns about the lack of public process and compliance with the Michigan Freedom of Information Act and Open Meetings Act. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The agreement, filed in federal court in Kansas, resolves violations of the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review requirements at the company’s Jeffrey Energy Center, a coal-fired power plant near St. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Murphy Oil case, in which the plaintiffs alleged that energy companies’ greenhouse gas emissions had caused greater damage from Hurricane Katrina, was dismissed, not on the merits of the case, but based on the arcane procedural rules of appellate law. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Murphy Oil case, in which the plaintiffs alleged that energy companies’ greenhouse gas emissions had caused greater damage from Hurricane Katrina, was dismissed, not on the merits of the case, but based on the arcane procedural rules of appellate law. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
Click Here Celanese plant pollution violation against energy provider settled for $310,000. [read post]