Search for: "Michigan v. Carp" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2016, 4:49 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Carp was the subject of one of our 2014 posts; his conviction, although it withstood a lengthily and withering appeal, arguably was a result of "guilt-by-association"; his co-defendant was a much older mastermind of the murder in which he was entangled.Now, Carp, along with the other juvenile lifers here in Michigan actually stand a chance at parole.Post #522www.clarkstonlegal.cominfo@clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
Michigan, 14-8106, and Carp v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Michigan, 14-824, for the first time. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Allen v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Alfonso Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 5:10 am by Jon Hyman
— via Mike Haberman’s Omega HR Solutions Why the majority and dissenting opinion in the Ninth Circuit case of Weaving v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
The Seventh Circuit, in the case of State of Michigan, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:33 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The consolidated cases decided this week by the Michigan Supreme Court, known as People v Carp, et al, squarelyaddressed the narrow issue of whether the SCOTUS ruling in Miller should be applied retroactively.If Miller's ban on mandatory life sentences for juveniles is applied retroactively, then the 350 juvenile lifers in MDOC prisons would have a shot at parole. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:59 am by Timothy P. Flynn
FlynnOral argument is scheduled in the Michigan Supreme Court for March 6th in the juvenile lifer case of People v Raymond Carp to determine whether the SCOTUS decisions banning state juvenile lifer laws should get retroactive application. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
  For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 9:28 am by WIMS
          On October 9, 2012, Schuette's office filed a response to the supplemental motion to dismiss in Michigan, et al v Corps of Engineers, et al before Judge John J. [read post]