Search for: "Michigan v. Fisher"
Results 61 - 80
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In Fisher v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:20 pm
Why did the Supreme Court decide to take Fisher v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
And we found law, undergrad, and med-school discrimination even at the University of Michigan (before voters banned it) – and indeed worse undergrad discrimination than there was in the system that the Supreme Court struck down in Gratz v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Field Fisher Defamation Law Blog. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:20 pm
For example, you can receive alerts on the highly anticipated affirmative action case Fisher v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
And in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
Prior to its 2013 decision in the present case, the last time the High Court addressed the issue of affirmative action in higher education admissions was in June 2003 when it upheld, by a 5-4 vote, the University of Michigan’s consideration of race as one of many “plus factors” in its law school admissions policy that considered the overall individual contribution of each candidate (Grutter v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,415). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Michigan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Meanwhile, the closely watched Fisher v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
Lyle reported on the King v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Michigan, 14-8106, and Carp v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Michigan, 14-824, for the first time. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
In Michigan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:37 pm
This year marks the tenth anniversary of Crawford v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm
In fact, the Court explained that in more recent cases, such as Michigan v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:45 pm
This year marks the tenth anniversary of Crawford v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:12 pm
Just came across this Symposium in the Michigan Law Review Online: “Crawford v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
The majority concluded that, under Feiner v. [read post]
