Search for: "Michigan v. Fisher"
Results 161 - 180
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2012, 9:00 am
By Mike Dorf Today the SCOTUS granted certiorari in Fisher v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:59 am
The case is Fisher v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
Is the court’s holding in Grutter inconsistent with the principles of Brown v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
Is the court’s holding in Grutter inconsistent with the principles of Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:26 pm
A report on the case of Fisher v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
In the first of the new cases, Fisher v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:27 pm
Fisher is the named plaintiff in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Fisher, set for the afternoon argument on Tuesday, October 11. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:30 am
Fisher v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm
FISHER, No. 10-637 (lower court cite 606 F.3d 85). [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:59 pm
.” The argument was made as the closely watched case of Fisher v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:08 pm
Here's Judge Edith Jones, writing for herself and four other conservative 5th Circuit judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc in Fisher v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:57 am
Fisher, 2011 U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals in Fisher Sand and Gravel v Neal A. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals in Fisher Sand and Gravel v Neal A. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
The panel points out that Fisher doesn’t say, and that the high court’s “holdings continue to leave gaps in the analysis that create uncertainty for the lower courts,” but apply Fisher retroactively without actually saying so. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:17 am
(The case is Fisher Sand and Gravel v Neal A Sweebe, an 8 page opinion available through Michigan Lawyers Weekly, 07-75990) More Michigan Collection Law in extensive detail (700 page book), Handling the Collection Case in Michigan [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
In Fisher Sand and Gravel Co v Neal A Sweebe, Inc, No. 297156, Judge Owens authored the majority opinion in this case of first impression, holding that the plaintiff’s claim for payment on an open account relating to the sale of goods was barred by the four year limitations period in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Third, a dissent by Judge Fisher on the NFMA issue follows Part VII. [read post]
