Search for: "Michigan v. Kolanek"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2012, 11:24 am
Kolanek and People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
King and People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
On June 22, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in three cases addressing the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act: People v King, No. 142850, People v Kolanek, No. 142695, People v Kolanek, No. 142712. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:58 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, No. 142671. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:38 am
As we discussed, the Michigan Court of Appeals previously stated in the case of People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 6:49 pm
Just prior to the holidays, the Michigan Supreme Court deepened its medical marijuana jurisprudence by deciding another key case applying the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:21 am
The case, People v Kolanek, consolidated the separate convictions of Alexander Kolanek, and Larry King; the former an Oakland County case, the latter from Shiawassee County.As detailed by this blog over the past three years, the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act has had a brief and tortured existence. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 4:06 am
The case, People v Bylsma, was decided by the Michigan Court of Appeals in a published decision one year ago. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:38 am
Kolanek, Case Nos. 142695 and 142712, and People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm
The Court of Appeals recently held in People v Kolanek that the relevant deadline for obtaining the physician’s statement under the MMMA was the time of arrest. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
Kolanek and People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:59 pm
Kolanek. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:29 pm
Granting the prosecution’s application for leave to appeal this issue of first impression, the Court of Appeals in a per curiam opinion in People v Kolanek, No. 295125, concluded that the physician’s statement must occur after the enactment of the MMMA (December 4, 2008), but prior to arrest. [read post]
