Search for: "Michigan v. Pullen"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 7:17 am
The Michigan Supreme Court ordered that trial court proceedings be stayed in People v Pullen while the application for leave to appeal remained pending in the Court of Appeals. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:17 am
Pullen, No. 142751, and People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:27 am
Pullen, Case No. 142751. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:43 pm
Pullen, Case No. 142751 and People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
The Michigan Supreme Court ordered that the application for leave to appeal in People v Yeakey, No. 142658, be held in abeyance pending the Michigan Supreme Court’s decisions in People v Pullen (No. 142751) and People v Watkins (No. 142031), which may resolve an issue raised in the application. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:44 am
It is much easier for the prosecutor to introduce such evidence in an sexual assault trial.In the People v Watkins case, the Michigan Supreme Court, recognizing the irresolvable conflict between the evidentiary rule and the statute, held that the statute controls. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:21 am
Pullen, 665 F. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
Pullen. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:44 am
” And as much as no one wants to be compared to the Cleveland Browns, the recent, related cases of Pullen v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:39 am
And it was unlikely the putative class members would be found to be similarly situated upon completion of discovery (Pullen v McDonald’s Corp, September 15, 2014, O’Meara, J). [read post]
