Search for: "Michigan v. Thomas"
Results 221 - 240
of 991
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu) Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu) Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto (jacq.briggs@utoronto.ca)John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jowertheimer@davidson.eduLaw and Empire in the Sino-Asian Context (Harvard Law School / TBD)12:00 PM – 4:30 PMLegal History and the Persistent Power of State and Local Governments (Cambridge Room)Moderators: Brooke… [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Douglas V. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:13 am
Facts: This case (AmGuard Insurance Company v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
[The Structure of NFIB v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
In 2011, Justice Thomas Lee of the Utah Supreme Court was the first to use corpus linguistics in a judicial opinion: In re the Adoption of Baby E.Z.* Since then, the Utah Supreme Court has continued to use corpus linguistics, and in 2016 majority and dissenting opinions from the Michigan Supreme Court both embraced corpus linguistics in People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
., Thomas E. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm
Thomas P. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
Indeed, kids do a lot of copying that isn’t even noticed as copying: trace the letters to learn how to write; instruction where we have students watch then do, which is to say copy, then teach, which is to say have others copy you; perhaps this can often be distinguished as processes v. outputs, but copying letters is copying outputs, not just tasks. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm
Stitt and Stokeling v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Justice Thomas with opinion in Parker Drilling v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
” At his Irish Liquor Lawyer blog, Sean O’Leary looks at a Michigan law regulating out-of-state wine retailers that is currently stayed pending the outcome of Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:20 am
Thomas’ decision in Hyatt fits within this framework, in that the five justices who voted to overrule did so on the grounds that Nevada v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
Court Rules Defendant Objections to Discovery Requests Are Too Late, Too Little: eDiscovery Case Law
2 May 2019, 10:01 pm
In Thomas on Behalf of Estate of Thomas v. [read post]
