Search for: "Michigan v. Wood" Results 61 - 80 of 204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan – Southern Division:  Welch v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit that allowed the rule to remain in effect while the EPA revised the way it considered costs in crafting the regulation—a process required by the Supreme Court’s ruling last year in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 4. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 21367 (ED CA, Feb. 19, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint of a Wiccan inmate that he was not permitted to ceremonially burn wood in a fire pit.In Cary v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:28 am by Megen Miller
In the published opinion Doe v Boyle, Docket No. 320102 (September 22, 2015), after a lengthy battle, the Court of Appeals awarded court-appointed guardian ad litem Thomas Woods costs and attorney's fees for his services on a personal injury suit as a guardian ad litem for the defendant minor child. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Cal Biz Lit, more] Citizen suits and consent decrees: in New England, “Conservation Law Foundation wields tremendous power” [Peter Ubertaccio, WGBH] “EPA Shifts its Legally Suspect ‘Environmental Justice’ Agenda into Higher Gear” [Glenn Lammi, WLF] Breaking: Supreme Court rules 5-4 against EPA on Clean Air Act power plant emissions rule [CNN, Michigan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]