Search for: "Microsoft Corporation v. Buy More, Inc. et al"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 1:01 pm
Microsoft asks the court to adjudge its motion to dismiss regardless of any commitments not to close the deal before a given date.Here's Microsoft's motion, filed late Tuesday afternoon Pacific Time:De Martini et al. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
Wilkinson is Microsoft's renewed motion to dismiss: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Combay Inc. et al. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
Rob Fusari et. al. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The agencies are considering more novel and more aggressive theories than contemplated in previous administrations. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
Philip Morris USA, et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
But suppose instead, a thief, who does not work at Microsoft, breaks into Microsoft headquarters via a basement window at midnight, reads Microsoft’s CFO’s papers about an upcoming positive earnings announcement and then buys Microsoft stock before that announcement. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares… [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
Lohmus, Havel & Viisemann, et al in 2005. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
” It is a non-practicing entity that buys patents in order to monetize them, whether through licensing or litigation. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
: (Michael Geist),Prentice backtracks on Treaty Policy: (Michael Geist),Microsoft misleads o [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (Spicy IP), It’s a mad idea, but it might just work – Sun’s decision to reduce number of patent applications: (IAM) More alternative ADR practices: preventing patent shark attacks: (The IP ADR Blog), The ADR: insurance and indemnity agreements – protecting against patent terrorists: (The IP ADR Blog), Language and IP value and valuation: (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Global - Copyright Grammy winner, Joss Stone, shows support for music… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
From its controversial collaborations to its legal skirmishes with corporate giants, MSCHF’s journey exemplifies the complexities and contradictions inherent in the intersection of art and copyright law. [read post]
