Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2013, 7:09 am
The plaintiff worked for Microsoft Libya as a marketing lead in Tripoli, Libya, until a revolution erupted and he was evacuated to the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm
A federal jury in Seattle has already rendered a verdict on the Microsoft v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:39 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:29 am
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:00 am
Resolving a current split amongst multiple federal circuits, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 7:07 am
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently declined to institute a CBM review of U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:15 pm
Procedural History"DataTern appeals from the [United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Which brings us to Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership and Janus Capital Group v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
Due to the unforeseen unavailability of a panel member, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had to postpone the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:09 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term: former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
14 May 2007, 5:49 am
Unfortunately for Free and Open Source developers and users, Microsoft's claims have more weight given the strength of software patent claims in the United States. 235 patents are not something to be shrugged-off, this could truly spell the demise of many small-scale FOSS projects.I've been trying to figure out the strategy behind this, after all, there was a feeling in some sectors that Microsoft had been warming towards FOSS. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:47 am
In the United States, standing requires that the plaintiff either own the patent being asserted or at least have exclusive rights to the patent. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:31 am
JOSEFFER (ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING THE PETITIONER): The United States view — I’m not sure exactly how much we disagree on this — but the United States view is that, for example, a blank disk is not a component of this invention because you don’t need a blank disk to practice this invention. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:34 pm
Prior to that I'd like to note two things:The timing of the new lawsuit -- a few weeks before a breach-of-FRAND-contract jury trial (scheduled to begin on August 26) -- is a clear message that Google remains opposed to the idea of having its worldwide SEP issues with Microsoft resolved in the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:49 pm
The 11th Circuit took a dive into this interesting issue in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:55 am
Motorola ruling is highly influential, Judge James Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington -- with support from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- has become the pioneer and thought leader in the U.S. with respect to the adjudication of FRAND licensing terms by federal courts through the substantive and procedural decisions has has already made in the Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm
served as Special Trial Counsel for the United States Department of Justice in its antitrust suit against Microsoft. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:11 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership, with Chief Justice John Roberts taking no part in the decision or petition. [read post]
