Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am
Ericsson evidentiary hearing (a trial by any other name) in the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) (Presiding Judge: Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Monica Bhattacharyya.Here are the minutes of the final trial day in Texas, which was rather short owing to the settlement:Ericsson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
The claim about "more mature content for more serious gaming" is something that with my games industry background (once the first person to work for Blizzard outside the United States) and my own experience playing games I have to reject: it's just not true that mature content implies or fosters serious gaming. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
To set the stage, Epic v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 11:45 pm
In my recent analysis of the rule-of-reason balancing question in Epic Games v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:11 pm
Although many people have paid attention to the FTC’s actions in the tech sector under Khan, the FTC’s power and authority overshadow all businesses in the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had entered the following order on Tuesday (November 15):"The request by plaintiffs Epic and Match to file amended complaints, [...], is granted. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 8:09 am
These problems would almost certainly arise if the FTC’s statement was blessed by courts in the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:18 pm
" The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit just held its Epic Games v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
First, legislative measures like the DMA, regulatory intervention such as the ongoing DG COMP investigation of the Google Play Store, and litigation (in less than a week, the Ninth Circuit will hear Epic v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the equivalent state level agencies. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:40 am
Apple judgment by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:28 pm
Two courts have determined that a defendant “purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting business in the United States by distributing the Infringing content on platforms such as the Google Play store and Microsoft App store. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:25 am
Apple trial in the current multi-jurisdictional dispute.At this stage, the jurisdiction that has received more attention than any other--oddly, even more than the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the United States--for its review of Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard is the Competition & Markets Authority (CMA) of the United Kingdom. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
Due to the unforeseen unavailability of a panel member, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had to postpone the Epic Games v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:28 am
The Epic v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 5:44 am
That is a fact, and it was also mentioned during last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 11:11 pm
After the Epic Games v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
Ofcom states that if competition concerns are identified, it could lead to further action. [read post]