Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:32 am
Version 1.0 of the panel opinion contained an unfortunate, oblique reference to Microsoft v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 2:08 am
Apple, Qualcomm v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
It currently still holds 6.72% of the search market share in the United States, followed by Yahoo at 2.92%. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 12:59 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 11:24 am
As an easy example, law firms often include disclaimers on their website that state any information found on the website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:01 am
In WhatsApp Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Last month, Judge Green of the Los Angeles County Superior Court in Crest v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
It is therefore a "requirement that pseudonymity be limited to the 'unusual case.'" United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:02 pm
Around the same time as when Jimmy Lai made public statements calling for sanctions, the United States passed a legislation imposing financial sanctions on officials of China and the HKSAR. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
The district court's judgment provided a perfect starting point.The two camps in this caseEpic got tremendous support from the DOJ, 35 state AGs, academics including Herbert Hovenkamp, Microsoft, and NGOs. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 3:30 pm
’” Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:17 am
The post Putin v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
Qualified Immunity: Federal law provides a cause of action for individuals who have been “depriv[ed] of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” of the United States by a person acting under the color of law. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:57 am
In one of the most important antitrust cases in the history of our industry, the Google Android case (one of several pending Google v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 10:37 pm
For instance, the Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:09 pm
by Dennis Crouch Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
