Search for: "Middleton v. Middleton" Results 21 - 40 of 287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
Well, first, don’t eat British Columbia, Canada oysters for a bit. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Plevel
  She also ruled against the South Carolina State Election Commission in striking down a witness requirement for absentee voting during the height of the pandemic, in Middleton v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Morken (hereinafter together the Farrell Fritz defendants) and the defendants Campolo, Middleton & McCormick, LLP, Joseph N. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Morken (hereinafter together the Farrell Fritz defendants) and the defendants Campolo, Middleton & McCormick, LLP, Joseph N. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
For example, the PTO denied registration under Section 1052(c) to ROYAL KATE as applied to watches, cufflinks, jewelry, and other luxury products based solely on the determination that “ROYAL KATE identifies Kate Middleton whose identity is renowned. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 9:49 pm by Mark Summerfield
In a unanimous decision – Commissioner of Patents v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 202 – a Full Bench of three judges (Middleton, Perram and Nicholas JJ) of the Federal Court of Australia (‘Full Court’) has reversed last year’s ruling by Justice Burley that claims directed to a so-called ‘feature game’ implemented on an electronic gaming machine (EGM) constituted a patent-eligible ‘manner of manufacture’… [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 7:00 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Court of Appeal has previously interpreted this provision in Middleton v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
Justices Middleton, Jagot and Moshinsky identified three errors of principle in Justice Perram’s evaluation of ‘strong reasons’, enabling them to re-evaluate whether strong reasons existed. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:27 am by Mark Summerfield
In 18 June 2021, a Full bench of the Federal Court of Australia (Middleton, Nicholas, and Burley JJ) unanimously upheld a decision of a single judge of the court (Beach J), finding that a method of detecting cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood serum comprises patent-eligible subject matter (i.e. a ‘manner of manufacture’) under Australian law: Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v Sequenom, Inc [2021] FCAFC 101. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:27 am by Mark Summerfield
In 18 June 2021, a Full bench of the Federal Court of Australia (Middleton, Nicholas, and Burley JJ) unanimously upheld a decision of a single judge of the court (Beach J), finding that a method of detecting cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood serum comprises patent-eligible subject matter (i.e. a ‘manner of manufacture’) under Australian law: Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v Sequenom, Inc [2021] FCAFC 101. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Daily Record Staff
Koushall, who was working as a Baltimore City police officer, struck Henrietta Middleton in ... [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
The British Press has described Ms Markle as “(almost) straight outta Compton”, othered her by discussing her “exotic DNA”, and criticised her for doing the same things for which Kate Middleton was praised. [read post]