Search for: "Miles v. Scutt" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 10:05 am by Michael Scutt
That put liability firmly back onto the two directors (and not the other “innocent” directors) and instead of making an award against all, the court held that an award should only be made against those directors (Gilbank v Miles (2006) IRLR 538 ) who had “consciously fostered and encouraged a discriminatory culture” . [read post]