Search for: "Miller v. Board of Supervisors"
Results 41 - 60
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm
It cited Robinson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:19 am
In Miller v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Internet and Social Media The Bar Standards Board has issued new Social Media Guidance. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:23 am
The article also suggested that plaintiff posed as a promotions supervisor in order to meet women. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
”Last year the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board issued a significant panel decision, Patterson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:53 am
The Commission certified the FEIR and voted 3-2 to recommend the staff alternative to County’s Board of Supervisors. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:59 am
Board of Supervisors (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1467, 1479-1482.) [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:42 pm
Mendocino County Bd. of Supervisors (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 564; McAllister v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:57 am
The school district’s attorney, Frank Miller, Esq., said. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm
The consultant thus concluded CEQA’s recirculation requirement was not triggered, and the Commission recommended approval of the modified plan to County’s Board of Supervisors. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 9:32 am
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed legislation in December 2011 to prevent this from happening, but Mayor Ed Lee, an avid golfer, vetoed the legislation. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
Board of Supervisors (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 1332, 1338.) [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:20 am
Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 44.) [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162 (holding Napa County’s revised lot line adjustment ordinance properly classified lot line adjustment decisions consistent with the Map Act’s exemption as ministerial in nature and exempt from CEQA); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 144 (2006) (likewise); Miller v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:10 am
The resulting class action, Handschu v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 11:27 am
Monterey County Board of Supervisors (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 99, 125 [“Environmental conditions may vary from year to year and in some cases it is necessary to consider conditions over a range of time periods. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
Kern County Board of Supervisors (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 708, also addressed important CEQA baseline and railroad operation preemption issues. [read post]
