Search for: "Miller v. Board of Supervisors"
Results 81 - 100
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2007, 1:48 pm
Law Judge Mary Miller Cracraft issued her decision July 15, 2004. *** Correctional Medical Services, Inc. (3-CA-23855; 349 NLRB No. 111) Albany, NY May 31, 2007. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:55 pm
People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
Rose v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Kern County Board of Supervisors, et al. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
” (Last quoting Jensen v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
Miller, an assistant to the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 pm
Me. 2008); Alabama v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:38 pm
However, he acknowledged Board precedent to the contrary. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
Rose, Jim Miller, Elaine Kamarck and Maya MacGuineas will be on the panel. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
NLRB v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
Relevant Factual and Procedural Background The County and its Board of Supervisors adopted a revised MND and issued a conditional use permit (CUP) for the project, which proposed operation of “a bed and breakfast and commercial event facility supported by onsite crop production intended to provide visitors with an education in agricultural operations. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
Sierra Watch v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:22 pm
Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 570; Gov. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
As CEQA practitioners will discover upon reading this case, Royalty, Friends, and the decision in Board of Supervisors v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:15 am
HOW CAN WE CONVENE OUR BOARD AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE? [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 1:59 pm
HOW CAN WE CONVENE OUR BOARD AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE? [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 1:59 pm
HOW CAN WE CONVENE OUR BOARD AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
