Search for: "Miller v. District Court, et al" Results 81 - 100 of 398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
First District Holds CEQA Action Can Be Brought Directly Against Local Air District to Challenge “Authority to Construct” Issued for Mendocino County Asphalt Production Operation
1 Jun 2017, 3:57 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Mendocino County Air Quality Management District (Grist Creek Aggregates, LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (1st Dist., Div. 1, 2017) ___ Cal.App.5th ___.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Discovery Rule Does Not Postpone Accrual of CEQA Cause of Action; Events Specified In CEQA Statute of Limitations Provide Constructive Notice of Project Approval or Commencement
26 Jul 2016, 10:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Communities for a Better Environment, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
U.S. views sought on misspent federal funds law
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
 The case is Graham County Soil & Water District, et al., v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Berkeley Hillside CEQA Cat Ex Case Redux: Kapors Get Their Mansion, First District’s Belatedly Published Opinion Upholds City’s Decision That “Unusual Circumstances” Exception Does Not Apply
10 Nov 2015, 11:56 am by Arthur F. Coon
Berkeley Hillside Preservation, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds CEQA’s Class 3 Categorical Exemption Applies To Installations of Small Telecommunications Equipment On Existing Utility Poles, Recognizes Split In Case Law On Standard of Review For Cumulative Impact Exception
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (T-Mobile West Corporation, et al., Real Parties) (July 26, 2012, 1st Dist., Div. 4) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2012 WL 2948575. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds CEQA’s Class 3 Categorical Exemption Applies To Installations of Small Telecommunications Equipment On Existing Utility Poles, Recognizes Split In Case Law On Standard of Review For Cumulative Impact Exception
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (T-Mobile West Corporation, et al., Real Parties) (July 26, 2012, 1st Dist., Div. 4) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2012 WL 2948575.  [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
No Surprises Here: First District Applies CEQA Subsequent Review Standards Mandated by Supreme Court on Remand, Again Affirms Judgment for Petitioner in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens Litigation
11 May 2017, 8:18 am by Arthur F. Coon
San Mateo Community College District, et al. (1st Dist., Div. 1, 2017) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
No Miller Act Setoff for Non-Federal Claims
8 Nov 2010, 8:28 am by Christopher G. Hill
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia last month. [read post]
Construction Law Musings - http://constructionlawva.com
Taxpayers File Suit Over IRS Rule on Health Care Act Tax Credits
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
taxgirl - http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/
Illinois Appellate Court Reverses Dismissal of Case Based on Qualifications of Medical Expert
23 Sep 2016, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Beverly Coote, et al. v. [read post]
Chicago Medical Malpractice Attorney Blog - http://www.chicagomedicalmalpracticeattorney-blog.com/
Hakkasan denied preliminary injunctive relief in cybersquatting case for failure to establish irreparable harm
5 Mar 2015, 3:45 pm
”  SeeHakkasan LV, LLC et al v. [read post]
Las Vegas Trademark Attorney - http://www.vegastrademarkattorney.com/
First District Applies CEQA’s “Subsequent Review” Rules, Substantial Evidence Standard of Review; Upholds Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration and Modified Master Use Permit for Remote Buddhist Retreat
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
County of Sonoma (Jack Petranker, et al., Real Parties In Interest) (1st Dist., Div. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fifth District Reaffirms Its CEQA Historicity Rules in Citizens for the Restoration of L Street v. City of Fresno
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Fresno (FFDA Properties, LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (5th Dist. 2014) __ Cal.App.4th ___, Case No. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
U.S. Court of Appeals Ruled that Previous Business Owner Did Not Violate Non-compete Agreement
25 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Miller Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 16-1204 (U.S. [read post]
Chicago Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.robertkreisman.com/injury-lawyer/
Sometimes It Is Best to Bite Your Tongue! Sixth Circuit Holds University's Diversity Interests Outweighed First Amendment Right to Freedom of Speech
7 Jan 2013, 11:17 am by Lisa Whittaker
Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
Employer Law Report - http://www.employerlawreport.com/
Case o' The Week: Ninth Unmoved by The Miller's Tale - Wire Fraud Jury Instructions
29 Mar 2020, 10:21 am by Steve Kalar
  The District Court denied Miller’s motion to dismiss for prosecutorial misconduct, and the Ninth – while finding that the improper conduct was “clear” – nonetheless upheld the district court. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Blog - http://circuit9.blogspot.com/
Third District Declines To Reach CEQA Exemption Claim In Reversing On Other Grounds Judgment Upholding State Department of Public Health’s Approval of Santa Cruz County Needle Exchange Program But Notes New Statutory CEQA Exemption Now Exists
17 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Arthur F. Coon
Department of Public Health, et al. (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Oct. 6-10, 2008: US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
Toyota Motor, et al. [read post]
Sixth Circuit Cases - http://www.sixthcircuitcases.com/
No Common Interest In CEQA Compliance Prior To Project Approval, Holds Fifth District In City of Ceres Decision That Conflicts With Third District’s California Oak Decision And Common Practice
9 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Superior Court of Stanislaus County, City of Ceres, et al. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Classen Immunotherapies smoked via Bilski
21 Dec 2008, 11:19 am
Biogen et al. says:In light of our decision in In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/