Search for: "Miller v. Kerr"
Results 41 - 60
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017 [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:52 am
Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers, Frost v MGN, 24, 25 and 26 January 2017 (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
., United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr (massively paraphrased): but has Parliament has not given citizens of the UK rights by way of the 1972 Act, and therefore would have to be consulted in order for them to be taken away? [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed… [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
It is difficult to conceive of a case that better fits this description than R (Miller & Anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:47 am
Permission to appeal has been granted by a panel of three Justices (Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr) and the case can now proceed to a full hearing. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 12:29 pm
Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976) (same). [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:36 am
See Miller v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:54 am
Miller, 425 U.S. 435, 443 (1976); Phibbs, 999 F.2d at 1077-78. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:00 am
Louisiana that Miller v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:00 am
Louisiana that Miller v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:03 pm
Rose, JD, MBA, Principal, Rachel V. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
His concurring opinion does not question, or even cite, Smith, Miller, or the third-party doctrine in any way. [read post]
