Search for: "Miller v. Leone" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 3:20 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Miller v R [2010] EWCA Civ 1578 (09 July 2010) IT (Sierra Leone) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 787 (09 July 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) English UK Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726 (Admin) (09 July 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Airways Aero Associations Ltd v Wycombe District Council [2010] EWHC 1654 (Ch)… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: Below are today's tort law Appellate Court opinions: AC31225 - Leon v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
This was the significant issue in Leon St.Clair Nation v City of New York.St. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:59 am by Susan Brenner
The applicability of the Leon principle was at issue in U.S. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:26 am by P.J. Blount
Diederiks Verschoor, An Introduction to Air Law, Ninth Revised Edition (Revised by Pablo Mendes de Leon) Geospatial Law United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Susan Brenner
  During the search, Hager told them he knew Miller and admitted that he knew Mueller was molesting his daughters and admitted he had received non-pornographic pictures of Mueller's daughters. . . . [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:37 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Two DVDs--Jay Sin's Milk Nymphos and Joey Silvera's Storm Squirters 2 (not to be confused with the opera of the same name), are obscene, according to the government, in that, taken as a whole, they lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value, which is the obscenity standard set by the Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d at 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88; Robertson v Wells, 95 AD3d 862, 863; Magnus v Sklover, 95 AD3d 837, 837). [read post]