Search for: "Miller v. Miller (1970)" Results 121 - 140 of 200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  SeeRestatement (Second) of Torts §134 & comment b (1970).Restatement of TortsThe heeding presumption is derived from language in Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment j (1965) that dealt with the opposite situation − presuming that an adequate warning, when given, will be read and heeded. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am by Sanford Rosen
  I thought about that project, and the “be careful of what you wish for” principle, when I read Chief Justice Roberts’s dissent in Miller v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
[9] See, e.g., Geoffrey Sawer, Modern Federalism 1 –2 (1969); Ivo Duchacek, Comparative Federalism 207 –08 (1970); Preston King, Federalism and Federation 60 (! [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am by Kelly Buchanan
Lord Denning in Miller v Jackson Also in the 1970s, English judge Lord Denning wrote one of his most famous judgments in a case that involved a dispute over cricket balls being hit out of a village cricket ground onto a neighboring property. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  The “star” of the symposium was the wonderful-in-every-way polymath Jonathan Miller, but in fact everyone was terrific. [read post]