Search for: "Miller v. National Broadcasting Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926, which was handed down on the same day. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
Furthermore, it was relevant that MATV broadcasts nationally and internationally and is pitched to appeal to the wider Asian community, and that it is a reputable broadcaster of edited news that viewers were likely to regard as authoritative [28]. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on Monday 19 April 2021 there was a Statement in Open Court in the case of Wain and Kelly v Channel 5 Broadcasting, before Collins Rice J. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Broadcasting Ofcom has produced its annual report on the BBC. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 5:23 am
The first defendant The Russian Television & Radio Broadcasting Company is based in Russia. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
On 3 March 2017 the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Lloyd-Jones and McCombe LJJ) gave judgment in the important data protection case of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Company Ltd & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 121. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
Broadcasting in the Internet Age: Survival of the Fittest? [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am
National Football League, No. 09-2182 (D. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
However, in a letter to the Minister the company rejected the minister’s concerns about media plurality and broadcasting standards, saying that she had based her view on “seriously flawed” evidence. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Canada Graeme Hamilton in the National Post has examined how a now defunct Romanian website, globe24h.com, has shown tensions between privacy and transparency in Canadian courts. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
Last week in the courts The Court of Appeal has dismissed the appeal brought by the broadcaster Russia Today (RT) against Ofcom for a £200,000 fine issued for breaches of impartiality. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:44 am
UHS of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P, Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Ansari v… [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
Twitter has acquired Squad, an app that lets users hang out with friends via video chat and screen-sharing, the company announced. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
On 25 June 2010, Eady J will hear further applications in the libel case of Miller v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s recent opinion in Washington v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Google, Facebook and other internet companies could be prosecuted if they do not stop extremist videos from being seen on their websites by people in Britain, as Ministers consider a new law. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
On 10 March 2023 there was a contempt application in the case of Miller -v- Peake QB-2022-001106. [read post]
