Search for: "Miller v. Noe" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Timing Is Everything: CEQA Notice of Exemption Must Be Both Facially Valid And Properly Filed To Trigger Short Limitations Period
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The case – Coalition for Clean Air v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Timing Is Everything: CEQA Notice of Exemption Must Be Both Facially Valid And Properly Filed To Trigger Short Limitations Period
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The case – Coalition for Clean Air v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“Permanent Vacation” In Palm Springs? – Fourth District Holds CEQA’s Short 35-Day Statute of Limitations Does Not Apply Despite City’s Filing of NOE Due To Subsequent Material Change In Street Vacation Project Which Triggered Maximum 180-Day Limitations Period
6 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Committee to Relocate Marilyn v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sixth District Holds CEQA Action Barred By 30-Day Statute of Limitations of Government Code Section 65457 Despite City’s Filing of Notice of Exemption
30 Jul 2013, 2:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  In May v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Once More Into the “Brambled Thicket”: Fourth District Reverses Ruling Sustaining Demurrer to Action Challenging Caltrans’ Claim of Statutory CEQA Exemption For Freeway Interchange Project, Holds Streets and Highways Code § 103’s Coastal Commission Exemption Does Not Apply And That Petition Adequately Pleaded Estoppel Against Caltrans to Assert 35-Day Statute of Limitations Based on NOE Filing
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Citizens for a Responsible Caltrans Decision v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Reaffirms Rule That Filing of Facially Valid NOD Triggers Short CEQA Statute of Limitations And Plaintiff May Not “Go Behind” Agency’s Declarations In Document To Challenge Validity of Project Approval
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing County of Amador v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Discovery Rule Does Not Postpone Accrual of CEQA Cause of Action; Events Specified In CEQA Statute of Limitations Provide Constructive Notice of Project Approval or Commencement
26 Jul 2016, 10:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
KSR v. Teleflex: In Support of the Status Quo
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
 KSR v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/
“The Year in CEQA: A Look Back”
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Redrawing CEQA’s “Parking” Lines? Second District Holds Parking Impacts of Covina Mixed-Use, Transit-Oriented Infill Project Are Statutorily Exempt From CEQA Review, Rejects Related Map Act Challenge
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
(Citing Concerned Dublin Citizens v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Holds Agency’s Removal of Conservation Designation From Land Formerly Protected Under MSHCP Is “Project” Subject to CEQA; Class 7 and 8 Categorical Exemptions for Environmentally Protective Regulatory Actions Do Not Apply
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Albert Thomas Paulek v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Upholds San Diego’s CEQA Class 3 Categorical Exemption Determination For Verizon’s Faux Tree Wireless Telecommunications Facility In Dedicated Public Park, Rejects City Charter Inconsistency Arguments
26 Mar 2018, 4:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Tomlinson v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2020: A Look Back at the Year’s CEQA Case Law
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Construes CEQA Guidelines’ Class 23 Categorical Exemption And “Unusual Circumstances” Exception In Rejecting Challenge To Watsonville Rodeo Event
7 Apr 2014, 5:18 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Citizens For Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds Sonoma County Vineyard Development (VESCO) Permit was Ministerial Approval Exempt from CEQA
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Engagement: CEQA’s Continuing Saga In California’s High Court
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The filing of a facially-valid Notice of Exemption (NOE) triggers a 35-day statute of limitations (Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Addresses CEQA Statute of Limitations And Tolling Agreement Rules In Affirming Judgment Upholding EBRPD’s Approval of Tree Removal MOU With PG&E
6 Jul 2021, 8:55 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Save Lafayette Trees, et. al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Holds Brown Act Requires Lead Agency To List CEQA Exemption As Item of Business On Agenda For Public Meeting When Project Already Found Exempt By Staff Is Considered For Approval
31 Oct 2022, 12:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Industries v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Addresses Numerous Significant CEQA Issues In Action Challenging City of San Diego’s Utility Undergrounding Projects
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  McCann v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
If A Tree Falls In The (Urban) Forest … Does CEQA Apply? Sixth District Holds City Of Santa Cruz’s Amendment Of Tree Protection Ordinance Not Categorically Exempt
13 Nov 2015, 9:09 am by Arthur F. Coon
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com