Search for: "Miller v. Patel"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
Among those Axios reported to be under discussion for senior government posts are Stephen Miller, Kash Patel, Steve Bannon, and Jeffrey Clark, who is currently under indictment in Georgia for his role in the fake electors scheme and a co-conspirator in the federal election indictment. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
Miller, 2023 WL 6385816 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
State Department, Matthew Miller, said today. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:43 am
In the subject of this blog, Miller v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Miller, Patel, and McCarthy have been viewed as crucial witnesses for understanding government’s response to the assault and former President Trump’s reaction to the breach. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Channel Lumber Co. (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1447, 1450; 2A Miller & Starr, Cal. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Priti Patel has announced that she is considering banning anonymous social media accounts in an attempt to tackle the “relentless” abuse of MPs online. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:53 pm
The argument is similar to that raised Singh v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:33 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Kubiak v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
In Roach v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:10 am
The resulting class action, Handschu v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
And the possibility of such shenanigans bears on the Hassell v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
Patel v Mirza, heard 16-18 February 2016. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:28 pm
As Jason Miller's explains in his useful note in the Seton Hall Circuit Review, while the Fourth Amendment principles behind hotel room searches are the same as behind any search (reasonable expectation of privacy awards standing for overnight guests), but hotels pose special fact-sensitive challenges, including registration under an alias, registration for a third party, paying with a fradulent credit card, exceeding checkout time, and the classic from Minnesota v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Miller. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
Kentucky challenge can uphold the legitimacy of a peremptory challenge for reasons other than those raised by the prosecutor in light of Miller-El v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Patel, 13-1175, a twice-relisted petition involving motel owners’ complaint that an L.A. ordinance which allows police to inspect motel records at any time without a warrant or consent violates the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
