Search for: "Miller v. Planning Commission" Results 61 - 80 of 310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Third District Addresses Significant CEQA Issues In Mixed Decision On Placer County’s EIR For Specific Plan/Rezoning Allowing Development of Martis Valley Timberlands
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  The Court further explained that, unlike the position of responsible agency occupied by the Coastal Commission in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Law and Media Round Up – 24 February 2020
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The European Commission has published its plan for the regulation of AI. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Tuesday round-up
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller urges the justices to review Marquette County Road Commission v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
CEQA Remedies Go Both Ways:  Fourth District Reverses Judgment Upholding San Diego County Board’s Decision Granting Project Opponents’ Administrative Appeal, Holds Board Erred In Finding CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Statutory Exemption Inapplicable And Ordering EIR Prepared for Exempt Industrial Project
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Hilltop Group, Inc., et al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Communications between union member and union representatives not privileged in civil lawsuit
7 Oct 2016, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
WKL&B WOrkDay Blog - http://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/blog
Reflections on the Oral Argument in the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Case: Some Interesting (and Disheartening) Features, Including Justice Kennedy’s Incomplete Description of U.S. History
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Investors Seek Delay on Access VoteSubmitted by: L. Reed Walton, Publications
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
A hedge fund also filed an access proposal at Reliant Energy, but the Texas-based company sought a court ruling that it was not bound by the AFSCME v. [read post]
Institutional Shareholder Services - Insight - http://blog.issgovernance.com/
Opinion issued in Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rialto (Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust et al. Real Parties in Interest) No. E052253.
1 Aug 2012, 9:57 am by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
  Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law Blog - http://michaelreiterlaw.wordpress.com/
Employee demoted after each return from military leave advances USERRA claim
22 Jun 2015, 6:40 am by Joy Waltemath
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
WKL&B WOrkDay Blog - http://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/blog
Did a Federal District Judge Defy the Supreme Court in Invalidating Male-Only Draft?
5 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The leading contemporary precedent on stare decisis (the fancy Latin term for precedent) is the 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Oct. 6-10, 2008: US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
A month later, the Planning Commission, faced with evidence that the restrictions had been violated, revoked the permit. [read post]
Sixth Circuit Cases - http://www.sixthcircuitcases.com/
Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc.: California Employers Should Dial Back On-Call Shift Policies
7 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm by Thomas Kaufman and Joseph Peacock
On February 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal, Second District issued a 2-1 decision in Ward v. [read post]
Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/
The National Commission on Public Service Is Right to Endorse Women’s Draft Registration
27 Mar 2020, 6:37 am by Max Z. Margulies
Supreme Court upheld male-only registration in Rostker v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Chapter 13 ( The Administrative Branches: The Non-Delegation Doctrine, An Introduction ): From "Elements of Law" to "Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States"--Building an Introductory Course to the Legal Curriculum for the 21st Century
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
CEQA Does Not Apply To Investor-Owned Public Utility’s Exercise Of Power Of Eminent Domain To Acquire Electric Facilities Maintenance Easement
19 Apr 2023, 10:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Robinson v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Neighbor-Led Group Opposing Single-Family Home Expansion Project Failed To Exhaust Administrative Remedies By Making Sufficiently Specific Objections To City’s CEQA Class 1 Categorical Exemption Determination
13 Mar 2023, 9:35 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Year in Review: Privacy
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
Four Thoughts on the Briefing in Carpenter v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
First District Upholds CEQA Categorical Exemption for Approval of Planned Parenthood Clinic in City of South San Francisco, Clarifies Implied Finding of No Exceptions is Analyzed for Record Support on Narrowest Possible Ground
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  The City’s Planning Commission approved the CUP after a public hearing and determining it fell within several categorical exemptions. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Upholds CEQA Categorical Exemption for Approval of Planned Parenthood Clinic in City of South San Francisco, Clarifies Implied Finding of No Exceptions is Analyzed for Record Support on Narrowest Possible Ground
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  The City’s Planning Commission approved the CUP after a public hearing and determining it fell within several categorical exemptions. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Failure to Pursue and Exhaust Administrative Appeal Remedy Results In Forfeiture of CEQA Challenge To Categorical Exemption Despite Lower Body’s Defective Hearing Notice
13 Apr 2021, 10:34 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Schmid v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com