Search for: "Miller v. Rivers" Results 41 - 60 of 236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
When seeking to modify an alimony obligation, the party must demonstrate that changed circumstances have substantially impaired his or her ability to support himself or herself
15 May 2012, 8:24 am by PaulKostro
(citing Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
It is appropriate to impute income to a spouse based on his or her substantial investments in non-income producing stocks
13 May 2010, 1:06 pm by PaulKostro
Miller, supra, 160 N.J. at 420. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
First District Holds CEQA’s Application To Public Agency’s Approval of Railroad Operations Is Preempted By Federal Law Despite Agency’s Agreement To Conduct CEQA Review And Preparation of EIR
6 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Wait too long with DNA paternity testing and you may be stuck with child support
14 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
See Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Absent a clearly expressed provision to the contrary, income from a significant inheritance can be considered in determining whether a significant change in circumstances has altered the status quo which existed at the time of the entry of the support ord
9 Jun 2011, 6:14 am by PaulKostro
(citing Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
To be entitled to a hearing on whether a previously-approved support award should be modified, the party moving for the modification “bears the burden of making a prima facie showing of changed circumstances
8 Jul 2010, 10:53 am by PaulKostro
See also Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
A decrease in the supporting spouse’s income is one form of changed circumstance that may warrant a modification of that spouse’s alimony obligation
9 Aug 2010, 8:26 am by PaulKostro
Id. at 151; see also Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Courts daily approve divorce settlements upon the express finding that it does not pass upon the fairness or merits of the agreement, so long as the parties acknowledge that the agreement was reached voluntarily and is for them, at least, fair and equitab
8 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by PaulKostro
” Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The court may balanced the parties’ respective incomes with alimony
16 Jul 2009, 10:39 am
See Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The Origins of "Necessary and Proper" (Part I: The Corporate Law Background)
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am by John Mikhail
  Along with Chisholm v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Breach of Contract
14 Mar 2010, 6:00 am by PaulKostro
Div. 2007); Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Second Circuit Holds International Comity Abstention Not Warranted When Parallel Proceeding Exists in Canada
1 Nov 2006, 5:28 am
Miller Features Syndicate, Inc., 216 F.Supp.2d 198, 212 (S.D.N.Y.2002). [read post]
Federal Civil Practice Bulletin - http://federalcivilpracticebulletin.blogspot.com/
Real property, capital assets, investment portfolio, and capacity to earn by diligent attention to business are all appropriate factors for a court to consider in the determination of alimony modification
16 Nov 2010, 9:52 am by PaulKostro
” Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
In the absence of unconscionability, fraud, or overreaching in the negotiations of a settlement, no legal or equitable basis exists to reform the parties’ property settlement agreement
23 Jun 2010, 3:42 pm by PaulKostro
” Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Absent unconscionability, fraud, or overreaching in the negotiations of the settlement, no legal or equitable basis exists to reform the parties’ property settlement agreement
13 Mar 2012, 9:07 am by PaulKostro
Super. at 282 (quoting Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Friday round-up
11 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Rachel Sachs
Miller reports on the oral argument earlier this week in Delia v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Current earnings have never been viewed as the sole criterion upon which to establish a party’s obligation for support
14 Oct 2010, 1:01 pm by PaulKostro
” Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
$1.5 Million Jury Verdict in Lawsuit Over Delayed Cesarean Section
16 Sep 2015, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Maxberry v. [read post]
Chicago Birth Injury Lawyers Blog - http://www.chicagobirthinjurylawyersblog.com/
In an application brought by a supporting spouse for a downward modification in alimony, a focal issue is the supporting spouse's ability to pay
9 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
If a support arrangement provided for the circumstances that are now alleged as changed, it would not ordinarily be equitable and fair to grant modification
2 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm by PaulKostro
Innes, 117 N.J. 496, 518 (1990) (stating a settlement agreement should be enforced by a trial court only to the extent it is equitable and just); Miller v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues