Search for: "Miller v. Zoning Board of Appeals" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2016, 3:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
Martinos v Bd. of Zoning Appeals of Town of Brookhaven, 2016 WL 1442176 (NYAD 2 Dept. 4/13/2016)    Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Non-Conforming Uses [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:35 pm by Patricia Salkin
Miller v Grundy County Board of Supervisors, 2015 WL 1817096 (IA App. 4/22/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Ethics, Wind Development [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 10:02 pm by Patricia Salkin
Schwartz v Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2015 WL 5601248 (PA Commonwealth 9/24/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Family, Student Housing [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 6:41 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Board of Zoning Appeals for Town of North Hempstead, the Appellate Division affirmed the denial of a use variance, finding that the property owner had a self created hardship due to the fact that he purchased the property for a commercial use when he knew it was zoned for residential use. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 6:41 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Board of Zoning Appeals for Town of North Hempstead, the Appellate Division affirmed the denial of a use variance, finding that the property owner had a self created hardship due to the fact that he purchased the property for a commercial use when he knew it was zoned for residential use. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 9:24 am
City of New Haven, Board of Zoning Appeals (see ILB entry here, about 2/3 down the page). [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:13 pm by Patricia Salkin
In this case, Miller alleged that Defendants SBA Towers V, LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and the City of Gloucester intentionally deprived him of statutorily required notice of the Zoning Board of Appeals proceedings concerning a variance needed to build the cell tower. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm by Patricia Salkin
On September 13, 2013, the Circuit Court for Baltimore County issued a memorandum opinion and order affirming the decision of the Baltimore County Board of Appeals (“Board of Appeals”), which affirmed the decision of the OAH. [read post]