Search for: "Million v. Board of Education" Results 41 - 60 of 1,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 6:48 am by Ashby Jones
The thrust of the suit: The group claims the state’s higher education commission devoted millions of dollars over decades to “traditionally white institutions” that offer educational programs duplicating those from the black colleges. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am by Howard Knopf
But the result is obviously what it is – which is a serious problem for the Board and for Canadian copyright policy, not to mention for Access Copyright and the Canadian educational community. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 4:52 pm
Such assistance was not forthcoming, so Curcio initiated proceedings before the Public Employees Relations Board (the board), claiming FTA and CTA breached their duties of fair representation and engaged in unfair practices in violation of the Educational Employment Relations Act (the Act). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Racial minorities appointed prior to the movement have better observable characteristics: In comparison with their non-minority counterparts, they have stronger educational backgrounds and are more likely to have entrepreneurial experience. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 2:30 pm by Howard Knopf
Here's a University Affairs article, also from entitled:Access Copyright lawsuit against York is first test of fair-dealing guidelines: The outcome of the case could have wide-reaching implications for Canada’s educational institutions.Frankly, this UA piece completely misses the point about the "mandatory" tariff issue, i.e. whether any tariff from the Board becomes wholly enforceable for potentially millions of dollars as soon as there is one instance of… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:16 am by Matthew C. Bouchard, Esq.
A $15 million school construction project is being let by a local board of education, and you really want this contract. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
The Board of Veterans’ Appeals denied his appeal, holding that he was not entitled to additional benefits beyond the 36 months allowed by the Montgomery program. [read post]