Search for: "Miner v. Miner"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2017, 7:07 am
In Gladney v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:20 am
With less than two months before the May 31 deadline for public companies to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the inclusion of conflict minerals in their products, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a final judgment in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:00 am
In Roberson v. [read post]
Money, Gold and Judges: D.C. Circuit Holds SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rule Violates the First Amendment
22 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
., et al. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:35 am
Here are updated materials in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 2:27 am
Court of Appeals decision came out earlier this week in National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 6:00 am
On April 14, 2014, in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
Also check out these industry-specific recaps of conflict mineral reporting from Deloitte… Debate: Safe Harbors v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
As it “is impossible to transfer rights to an assignee under an expired mineral lease,” in a case where oil, gas and mineral leases had expired prior to plaintiff’s acquisition of the property, the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal in Litel Explorations, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to rehear the First Amendment portion of the conflict minerals case (Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
In Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 10:50 am
” Minerals Separation v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:47 am
In Dodd v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:04 am
This order has been challenged now in this lawsuit: Public Citizen v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:51 pm
P’ship v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:48 am
Murray v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 6:20 am
The question with wide-ranging implications for Louisiana operators and mineral owners in Johnson et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:35 pm
In CLK Company, L.L.C. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
In the ongoing challenge to the SEC’s conflict minerals rule, the D.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1] The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
