Search for: "Minor v. Henderson" Results 1 - 20 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm by Lawrence Solum
Judge Henderson’s opinion explained how Proposition 209 created a special barrier for minorities and women, relying on the “political structure doctrine” announced by the Supreme Court in Hunter v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit Judges Merrick Garland, Karen LeCraft Henderson, and David Tatel this morning is its second oral argument related to the detention of Afghan detainee Obaydullah. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
Henderson, 955 So.2d 1193 (Florida Court of Appeals 2007). . . . [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by DOUGLAS MCGREGOR, BRODIES LLP
Rough and ready apportionment and the ambit of reasonable disagreement In recent judgments the Supreme Court has emphasised the limited role of a court of appeal when asked to review a judgment from a court below (see for example McGraddie v McGraddie 2014 SC (UKSC) 12 and Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd 2014 SC (UKSC) 203). [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm by Marty Lederman
In three recent posts, I've sharply criticized briefs filed by the Department of Justice--and by the Solicitor General, in particular--in the various iterations of the Hargan v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
[This writer salutes the judicial collaboration jointly undertaken by IP-heavyweight Floyd LJ along with Henderson and Peter Jackson LJJ]. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:20 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in Obaydullah v. [read post]