Search for: "Miranda v. A Justice of the Superior Court Department of the Trial Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
Justice Berger’s concurring opinion, addressing only a Miranda issue, was joined by four other justices, making it “the supplemental opinion of the Court. [read post]
22 May 2010, 10:20 am
Turow reports his public vindication from charges of unethical conduct and provides as evidence a statement by the public integrity section of the Justice Department that he and his superiors in the Justice Department had not violated any law, he shows a blindness to the issues he addresses. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:30 am
Because of the lower court's "unassailable" findings on the motion to suppress, the Superior Court's ruling rejecting the claim was not an unreasonable application of the Massiah line of cases. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
One justice dissented. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
In this case, the Commissioner of the Department of Labor reasoned that the old language applied. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:36 am
He even relied on their prevalence, in part, to justify the Court’s creation of the now famous Miranda warnings. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 1:04 am
The statements were admitted into evidence, and the defendant was convicted at a Superior Court jury trial. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
After all, forthcoming Supreme Court guidance seems unlikely given that the Court has not heard a juvenile interrogation case since Fare v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
After all, forthcoming Supreme Court guidance seems unlikely given that the Court has not heard a juvenile interrogation case since Fare v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
: Can a juvenile court dismiss a juvenile wardship petition in the interests of justice and commit a juvenile ward to the Department of Juvenile Justice on the basis of a prior sustained petition, even though Welfare and Institutions Code section 733 prohibits such a commitment of a juvenile ward unless “the most recent offense alleged in any petition and admitted or found to be true by the court” is a offense specified in subdivision… [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:01 am
” Cochise County Superior Court Judge James L. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:03 pm
My happiness was not shared at Janet Reno's Justice Department, which now had to decide what to do when Mr. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
Thompkins requires advice that a suspect has the right to stop talking at any time in order to establish an implied waiver of Miranda rights. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986); and 2) any unreasonable application of Miranda v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand this case for that court, in turn, to remand it to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the merits of Harrison’s juror-misconduct claims and a determination as to whether Harrison is entitled to a new trial. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm
Justice Scalia, joined by Justices Roberts and Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment of the Court that a pretrial motion need not actually postpone a trial, or create an expectation of postponement, in order for its pendency to be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Beginning even before the Supreme Court’s 1966 ruling in Miranda v. [read post]
