Search for: "Mission Imports, Inc. v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
When the Commission adopted the policy in 1972, it included a brief statement explaining why it needed the policy: “it is important to avoid creating, or permitting to be created, an impression that a decree is being entered or a sanction imposed, when the conduct alleged did not, in fact, occur. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
The same reluctance that infected federal courts appears to have affected antitrust appropriations by Congress too. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This figure is significantly lower than in 2016, when the Delaware Court of Chancery effectively put an end to the practice of disclosure-only settlements in In re Trulia Inc. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
Superior Ct. of California for Riverside Cnty., 478 U.S. 1, 8 (1986). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 2:31 pm
The Marchand decision The first wake-up call after Caremark came with the 2019 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Marchand v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am
To that end, the FTC released an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on earnings claims as it embarked on a mission to adopt a rule that would give the FTC, in its own words, “an important new tool to return money to consumers injured by deceptive income claims, and to hold bad actors accountable with civil penalties. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 6:33 pm
In Innocon Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 6:09 pm
The court’s decision in Hoekstra v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
In fairness to the Board, part of this delay was due to the detour through the Federal Court of Appeal on the issue of crown immunity. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 9:30 am
In the recent case of Orchard Estate Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
” (Mission Bay Alliance v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm
Although American-style shareholder primacy was firmly rejected by the Supreme Court of Canada in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, shareholders can certainly be one of the stakeholder interests considered. [read post]
