Search for: "Missouri v. Jenkins"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 11:44 am
Federal courts and most states have followed the reasoning of two US Supreme Court cases, Missouri v Jenkins and Richlin v Chertoff (see below), and allow attorney fee awards that include paralegal time. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
Missouri v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:37 pm
Rather, as the Court made clear in Missouri v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:48 pm
Ruth V. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:15 pm
Gore, Missouri v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:06 pm
Jenkins, and Richlin Security Service Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:18 am
He referred to Korematsu in his concurrence in Missouri v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 7:10 pm
” Mark Allen Jenkins v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:10 am
During my paralegal career, I've witnessed several court decisions that have had a positive impact on the issue of paralegal fees, including Missouri v Jenkins and Richlin v Chertoff. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
Supreme Court's lead in Baze v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:12 pm
It is important to note, however, that Missouri v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:48 am
This is reinforced by two significant Supreme Court cases: Missouri v Jenkins and Richlin v Chertoff. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Jenkins Issue: Whether the Court should overrule McDonald v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 22, 2008 US v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 2:16 pm
The court found further support in analogous precedent - e.g., Missouri v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:51 am
" Finally, the Court emphasized that the reasoning of its 1989 decision in Missouri v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Missouri Dep't of Corr., No. 07-1598 In an action raising a retaliation claim under Title VII against plaintiff's employer, a state correctional department, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, for purposes of a prima facie retaliation case: 1) a single comment at issue in the case was insufficient as a matter of law to support an objectively reasonable belief it amounted to unlawful sexual harassment; and 2) under the facts of the case, no reasonable person coul [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
