Search for: "Mitchell v. Garcia" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
Moreover, most courts have held that school districts are not entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity.2 11 In Mitchell v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  Only two of those trials were against the mainstream media – the Daily Mail (Garcia) and the Sun (Mitchell). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Garcia, Seventh Circuit: Appellants were charged with violations under RICO. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 10:21 am
Wells    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0074n.06 Garcia v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The first important event of the term is the hand down on 3 October 2014 of the judgment in the libel case of Garcia v Associated Newspapers  which was heard on 21-25, 28-9 and 31 July 2014 by Dingemans J. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am by INFORRM
(a) Greig v Stirling & anr (b) Hamaizia & Anor v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (c)  Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited (d) Mionis v Democratic Press SA & Ors (12) Who is the odd one out? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
(a) Greig v Stirling & anr (b) Hamaizia & Anor v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (c)  Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited (d) Mionis v Democratic Press SA & Ors (12) Who is the odd one out? [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On 6 October 2014, Dingemans J handed down judgment in the case of Garcia v Associated Newspapers ([2014] EWHC 3137 (QB)) . [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm by Jon Sands
  Such petitions are subject to dismissal, see Rose v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J gave directions in the two “Plebgate” libel actions, Mitchell v NGN and Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
£10,000 (a) Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited, £45,000 (c)  Appleyard v Wilby, £60,000 (b) Asghar v Nawaijang, £270,000 (3) The following letter appeared in The Times following the judgment in the Andrew Mitchell libel trial. [read post]