Search for: "Mitchell v. State, Dept. of Educ"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Dept. of Educ.,(1999) limited the ability of districts to pay tuition to religious schools, while the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:01 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reservedBoard of Education v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:58 am
Teachers Assn. v Board of Educ. of Sachem Cent. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978) (overruling holding of Monroe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Dept. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:42 am
Bonnette v Long Island College Hosp., 3 NY3d 281 (2004); Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 (1984). [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:59 pm
Washington Dept. of Servs. for Blind, 474 U. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Sec US Dept Ed Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitR. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
Mitchell H. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
<> The Hopi Tribe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
State Atty’s office. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:21 am
Mitchell, 350 U.S. 247, 256 (1956). [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Dept.: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor Judge: Hon. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am
” BOARD OF EDUC. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am
Emergency Jurisdiction Continues Under UCCJEA for More than Three Years Where Family Court Not Satisfied With Steps to Protect Children Taken by Home State of New Mexico Court In Matter of Bridget Y, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 6848352 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.), a 3-2 decison, the primary issue raised was whether Family Court properly exercised temporary emergency jurisdiction over the children pursuant to Domestic Relations Law 76-c (3). [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Justice Dept. [read post]
