Search for: "Mitchell v. State of Texas (two Cases)" Results 41 - 60 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am by MOTP
This case presents two issues: first, whether an affirmative defense may be the basis of a Rule 91a motion to dismiss; and second, whether the alleged destruction of evidence is an action “taken in connection with representing a client in litigation,” thus entitling the respondent attorneys to attorney immunity. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Two justices on that court voted to reverse, however, and eight members of the Texas Supreme Court sided with the majority in the court of appeals.So what should we conclude is the majority position? [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
Three additional favorable cases are noted from those weeks.The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in David Renteria v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 10:45 am by Stan Gibson
The district court further explained: In reviewing a jury award of disgorgement of profits for trade secret misappropriation under Texas law, the Federal Circuit in Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Kleinberger (pictured), Emeritus Professor of Law at William Mitchell College of Law in St. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 11:16 pm by Josh Blackman
[The Fifth Circuit has operationalized Justice Thomas's Murphy concurrence] The Fifth Circuit decided Texas v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Missouri Dep't of Corr., No. 07-1598 In an action raising a retaliation claim under Title VII against plaintiff's employer, a state correctional department, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, for purposes of a prima facie retaliation case: 1) a single comment at issue in the case was insufficient as a matter of law to support an objectively reasonable belief it amounted to unlawful sexual harassment; and 2) under the facts of the case, no… [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Jessica Smith
The only contrary authority that I found in the published case law is one Texas decision, that creates a split among sister courts on the issue. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Hardwick and Texas v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1983.Hersh, Seymour. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:21 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
I'd have preferred just two: (1) new federal provisions and (2) provisions borrowed from state law. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Recently, Judge Elrod (CA5) articulated this premise in Texas v. [read post]