Search for: "Mitchell v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2015, 3:30 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Tort Talkers may recall prior posts and articles here on the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Superior Court Judge Mitchel Ostrer of Mercer County held on March 5, in State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The Concurring Opinion can be viewed HERE.Source: Article - “Superior Court Addresses Post-‘Tincher’ Jury Instructions In Volkswagen Crashworthiness Case” by Max Mitchell in the Pennsylvania Law Weekly (July 31, 2019). [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
Superior Court Stresses Liberal Application of Service Rules in Reinstating Med Mal Lawsuit,” By Max Mitchell The Legal Intelligencer (July 5, 2023). [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 6:24 pm by Patricia Salkin
Mitchell, appealed from a judgment entered in Superior Court, which held that plaintiffs lacked standing and found in favor of the defendants, Brown University and the City of Providence. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 5:36 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
On January 30, 2018, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a per curiam Order agreeing to hear the appeal on the case of BouSamra v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 6:40 am by Daniel E. Cummins
According to an article in today's Legal Intelligencer by Max Mitchell, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued an Order on November 29, 2017 agreeing to hear an appeal in the case of Feleccia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:26 am by Michael DelSignore
In this case, involving a 16 year old victim, the Commonwealth could seek an indictment and move the case to superior court, changing the sentence range from 2.5 years maximum in district court to a 15 year maximum sentence in superior court. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm
Ostrer, Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division-Criminal Part, Mercer County, in State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:31 am by John Steele
Superior Court, 705 P.2d 347 (Cal. 1985)(invalidating a contingent fee arrangement in a public nuisance case) with San Francisco v. [read post]