Search for: "Mitchell v. Superior Court (1984)"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2009, 2:36 pm
Relying upon Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
According to the more recent Superior Court decision in Gillingham v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
Mitchell, 67 N.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
However, where the issue of the superior right of possession can be determined separately from title issues, the justice court has jurisdiction to decide the case. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court decided Ryan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
Mitchell, 67 N.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm
In the Courts On Monday 24 March 2014 Tugendhat J heard applications for third party disclosure in the linked “Plebgate” cases of Mitchell v News Group and Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Argued October 12, 1993 -- Decided May 26, 1994On certification to the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County.Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Several lower court decisions had done so explicitly: Overton v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Sec’y of Labor, 471 U.S. 290, 296 (1985) (quoting Mitchell v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:14 am
"The Supreme Court, 1984 term—foreword: the civil rights chronicles. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which covers Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Gelblum, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, California; Carey R. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Failinger, Professor of Law, Mitchell Hamline School of Law--Reflections on Nomos: Paideic Communities and Same Sex Weddings Russell G. [read post]
