Search for: "Mitchell v. Superior Court (People) (1989)"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2021, 10:20 am
The Roverano plaintiff appealed from the Superior Court’s straightforward application of a remedial statute. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Kardesch, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in Mitchell v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Sec’y of Labor, 471 U.S. 290, 296 (1985) (quoting Mitchell v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
