Search for: "Mobil Oil Corp., Appeal of"
Results 1 - 20
of 191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Exxon Mobil Oil Corp., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 3, 2007), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Two) reviewed de novo the trial court's determination that the collateral estoppel doctrine applied to establish the defendant's liability: Respondents take the position that de novo review is appropriate with respect to the presence of the three elements essential to collateral estoppel (i.e., whether the necessary parties are the same or… [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 6:19 am
In Parker v Mobil Oil Corp., 2006 NY Slip Op 07391, the New York Court of Appeals clarified the ways in which a plaintiff may prove causation through the use of expert testimony in a toxic tort case.... [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:11 pm
In brief, the case involved an allision between a Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU) and an oil platform. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 6:15 am
Mobil Oil Corp.1 on your radar screen. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
Mobil Oil Corp., No. 06-6337, 2007 WL 3317680 (10th Cir. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 5:22 am
Mobil Oil Corp., the Appellate Division, Second Department held in Edelson v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:57 pm
Mobil Oil Corp., No. 2008-0541 (La. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 6:24 am
Now the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered Exxon Mobil Corp. to pay $2.5 billion in punitive damages, the largest such award affirmed by a federal court in history. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 11:50 am
Mobil Oil Corp., Not Reported in F. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:38 pm
Exxon Mobil Corp. and its oil tanker subsidiary notified lawyers for fishermen and others harmed by the massive Alaska oil spill 20 years ago that on Wednesday it will pay them $470,268,908, but returned to a federal court to continue a fight over another $54.5 million. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
Exxon kept appealing all the way to the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:32 pm
"No decision on Exxon Valdez interest payments": The Associated Press provides a report that begins, "The Supreme Court has declined to decide whether Exxon Mobil Corp. must pay interest to victims of the nation's worst oil spill that would roughly double the $507 million judgment the high court approved in June. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:33 am
Exxon Mobil Corp., 489 Mass. 724, 187 N.E.3d 393, 394 (2022). 3 SLAPP stands for “strategic lawsuits against public participation. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:27 am
Although mobile purchases may be appealing to many consumers, surely the loss of personal privacy increases. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:44 am
Jury verdicts against the oil company totaled more than $1.6 billion, but the Maryland Court of Appeals reversed the awards. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:41 am
Lawyers for Exxon Mobil Corp. have asked the full U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 5:05 am
Exxon Mobil Corp., C.A. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:00 am
See Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:05 pm
Exxon Mobil Corp., which concerned a gas station. [read post]
