Search for: "Mobil Oil Corp., Appeal of" Results 141 - 160 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2010, 11:02 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
Exxon Mobil Corp., showed “reckless and reprehensible” behavior by failing to protect workers from dangerous radioactive material in used oil-drilling pipes, a lawyer for 16 men told a Louisiana jury. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm by admin
” Click Here Appeals court to rule on landfill restrictions. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 10:49 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 882 F.2d 490, 493 (11th Cir. 1989) (stating in a commercial lease setting that Florida courts require a plaintiff to show both procedural and substantive unconscionability). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:03 am by South Florida Lawyers
Mobil Oil Corp., 882 F.2d 490, 493 (11th Cir. 1989) (stating in a commercial lease setting that Florida courts require a plaintiff to show both procedural and substantive unconscionability). [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
In a class certification appeal, the Court speaks to the UCC's good-faith requirement Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:40 pm by Joe Koncelik
It is important to note that another federal district court (Northern District of California) in the case of Native Village of Kivalina v Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:25 am by Susan Brenner
Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 115 (1989): `A 'fraud on the court' occurs where it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system's ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party's claim or defense.' Rockdale Mgmt. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:38 pm
Exxon Mobil Corp. and its oil tanker subsidiary notified lawyers for fishermen and others harmed by the massive Alaska oil spill 20 years ago that on Wednesday it will pay them $470,268,908, but returned to a federal court to continue a fight over another $54.5 million. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
(IPKat) ECJ: Distinctive character must be acquired through use of trade mark before date of application: Imagination Technologies Ltd v OHIM (IPKat) (Class 46) EPO appeal ‘invalid for insufficiency’: Pipe for filling bottles/Gallardo Gonzales (PatLit) Prevent patents inhibiting knowledge diffusion for green technology, EU told (Intellectual Property Watch) IPREG to regulate IP professionals (IPKat) Tricky European patent question: what happens when international… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:52 am
  That represents more than 12 years of interest; Exxon Mobil Corp. had fought to limit the interest to less than a year’s worth. [read post]