Search for: "Modified Opinion filed 3/1/10"
Results 1 - 20
of 733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2021, 9:27 am
Opinion No. 20190351-CA Filed January 14, 2021 Fourth District Court, Provo Department The Honorable James R. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The EBA further stated that neither decision G 1/93 nor decision G 1/03 intended to modify the general definition of the requirements of A 123(2) established in opinion G 3/89 and decision G 11/91, which definition has become the generally accepted “gold” standard for assessing any amendment for its compliance with A 123(2). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
”) Published: 11/22/2011 10:01 AM [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
COA18-1011 Filed: 1 October 2019 Mecklenburg County, No. 14 CVD 13699 RICHARD OWEN SHIREY, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:01 am
In January 2020, the father filed a petition to modify the parent-child relationship, contending that circumstances had materially and substantially changed. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:18 pm
Further to our October 26, 2011 post, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) on November 10, 2011, issued the public version of its opinion modifying the final initial determination (“ID”) issued by former Chief ALJ Paul J. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 3:00 am
Feb. 1, 1994), the court modified the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Ill., according to the detailed contained in this opinion. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 as granted read :1. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
The Commission also reversed in part the ID’s conclusion that Phicom’s accused products do not infringe claims 1-3, 12, 24, and 25 of the ‘751 patent and modified the ID’s conclusion of law to read as follows: “Respondents Micronics’ accused products do not infringe claims 1-3, 12, 24, and 25 of U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:28 pm
References: [1] http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByArticle/Chapter_136/Article_2E.pdf[2] https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/? [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
July 1, 2010, orig. proceeding). [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm
The fact that comparative examples 3 and 4 fell within the ambit of claim 1 was merely a question of clarity. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:56 am
Rehearing Denied and Opinion Modified In Kern County Ministerial Oil And Gas Well Permitting Ordinance EIR Case On March 20, 2020, the Fifth District Court of Appeal filed an Order modifying its Opinion and denying the requests for rehearing of respondents (Kern County) and real parties (WSPA and CIPA) in King and Gardner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:31 am
He stated that the first message's property file listed the `modified’ time as July 15, 2009 at 12:51:58 p.m.; the second message's `modified’ date was July 15 at 12:52:24 p.m.; the third message had a `modified’ time of July 17 at 1:29:12 p.m.; and the fourth message had a `modified’ time of July 17 at 2:10:38 p.m. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 7:16 am
The joint appendix shall contain:(1) the CCA's decision;(2) copies of any unpublished opinions cited in the appellant's or petitioner's brief;(3) relevant extracts of rules and regulations;(4) relevant docket entries from the proceeding below;(5) "relevant portions of the pleadings, charges, findings from the proceeding below" [there appears to be an "and" missing between "charges" and findings"]; and(6) "other parts… [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am
Oral proceedings took place on 19 March 2018.The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained on the basis of one of the main request, filed with letter dated 6 September 2012; auxiliary request 1, filed with letter dated 31 May 2013; auxiliary request 1A, filed with letter dated 12 August 2014; auxiliary requests 2 to 7, filed with letter dated 31 May 2013; and supplementary auxiliary requests… [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am
Oral proceedings took place on 19 March 2018.The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained on the basis of one of the main request, filed with letter dated 6 September 2012; auxiliary request 1, filed with letter dated 31 May 2013; auxiliary request 1A, filed with letter dated 12 August 2014; auxiliary requests 2 to 7, filed with letter dated 31 May 2013; and supplementary auxiliary requests… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
The hedge funds filed an appeal this week. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
The hedge funds filed an appeal this week. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
Majority Opinion and Concurring Opinions filed December 21, 2017. [read post]
