Search for: "Moffat v. Moffat" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Moffat v Edmonton (City) Police Service, 2021 ABCA 183 (CanLII) [63] Newton established (at para 84) that the LERB’s mandate is “more robust” when considering the acceptability of particular police conduct or the integrity of the discipline process pursuant to its civilian oversight mandate. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm by Kevin
Moffat’s Shoo-Fly Powders for Drunkenness to last year’s United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The seeds of most of them can also be found in the Supreme Court's crucial holding in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:56 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
No surprises there and all about as common as……well me in a property programme or Russel Moffat who works for Newham council. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The balance between privacy and transparency in regard to disclosing MPs’ expenses was comprehensively settled by the High Court in 2008, following a trilogy of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) appeals in the then Information Tribunal: Leapman [pdf], Baker [pdf] and Moffat [pdf]. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:30 am by Howard Friedman
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, (11th Cir., July 15, 2015), the 11th Circuit vacated the district court's dismissal of an inmate's complaint that he was not permitted to observe two Santeria holy days.In Moffat v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:12 pm
Justice Yegan begins this opinion by saying:  "Mixing concrete, like baking a cake, is fraught with problems when the recipe is not followed. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Moffat, Conceptual Separability and the Copyright/Patent Boundary Ribbon rack: most famous hard case on conceptual separability, where there is no physical separability (as when you have a sculptured Mickey Mouse holding a working phone). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
The more serious analysis from John Bolch : A few more thoughts on litigants in person “As litigants in person seems to be the subject of the moment, I thought I would return briefly to S v AG, the case I reported yesterday, to point out a couple of things mentioned by Mr Justice Mostyn, typical of cases where parties are not professionally represented. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm by NL
Moffat in effect submitted, the Appellants betrayed ample familiarity with English in their various dealings with the court system. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm by NL
Moffat in effect submitted, the Appellants betrayed ample familiarity with English in their various dealings with the court system. [read post]