Search for: "Mohr v. United States" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Oct. 14, 2008) (reducing punitive damages award to comply with due process requirements of the United States Constitution); Anderson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 An individual family member has value to others as part of a functioning social and economic unit. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
Scruggs, you have heard the United States Attorney state what evidence he could present against you on this particular charge if the case were to go to trial. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
 McCooe, expressed his disagreement with his colleagues in a pithy memorandum decision which reads, in substantial part, as follows:A rent-stabilized tenant who moves to another apartment in the same building to become the superintendent reverts to rent-stabilized status when his employment is terminated for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Mohr v Gomez (173 Misc 2d 553 [App Term, 1st Dept 1997, McCooe, J., dissenting]). [read post]