Search for: "Monk v. Monk" Results 81 - 100 of 226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 28 and 29 January 2016 there was be an application in the case of Monks v National Westminster Bank plc before Sir David Eady. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On 28 and 29 January 2016 there will be an application in the case of Monks v National Westminster Bank plc. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
  Mediation in Sri Lanka   Legal Framework Even though Sri Lanka has a history of mediation, which runs back the times of ancient kingdoms where adults and monks acted as mediators and carried out community mediation at village councils, mediation was legally introduced to Sri Lanka in 1988 by the enactment of the Mediation Boards Act[11].[12] The Act defines mediation as any lawful means to endeavor to bring the disputants to an amicable settlement and to remove, with their… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   Justify v. specify: lawyers deal with specification. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Justice Sopinka famously said (in 1989) that judges are not monks (although he should also have said nuns) and can have a role to play in their communities. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:05 am by NCC Staff
His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, is a Buddhist monk and the spiritual leader of Tibet. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:11 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
Blečić v Croatia (2004) 41 EHRR 185; McCann v UK [2008] HLR 40; Cosic v Croatia App. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
En effet, pour déterminer la loi applicable, la Cour suprême a affirmé qu’il faut examiner si la question en litige est entièrement liée aux affaires maritimes au point de constituer légitimement du droit maritime canadien, qui relève de la compétence législative fédérale (Monk Corp. c. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm by Giles Peaker
Sims v Dacorum Borough Council [2014] UKSC 63 If there is a positive to take from this, it is that it is a Supreme Court judgment that won't take long to discuss. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Sims v Dacorum Borough Council the Court unanimously dismissed the appeal challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to follow Hammersmith and Fulham LBC V Monk [1992] AC 478. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 3:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal brought by the appellant challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to follow Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk [1992] AC 478, which states that a notice to quit given by one of a number of joint periodic tenants is effective to terminate the tenancy. [read post]