Search for: "Monroe v. Circuit Court" Results 41 - 60 of 288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
 (13) In other words, the Supreme Court may not have seen the last of Monroe Setser. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Michael O'Hear
 (13) In other words, the Supreme Court may not have seen the last of Monroe Setser. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:27 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 201(b) provides that The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it: (1) is generally known within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or (2) can be accurately and readily... [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Village of Monroe, issued on February 16, more than one year after the Second Circuit heard oral argument. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 3:18 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, in which the district court unilaterally determined damages without any jury finding, violates the Seventh Amendment. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm by Renee Newman Knake
The Supreme Court issued two lawyering opinions this morning, Holland v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
In Monroe County, Circuit Court Judge Luis M. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:47 am by Luke Burton
  The Kollaritsch panel read the Supreme Court’s leading case on the issue, Davis v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am by SHG
” A different panel of the Sixth Circuit just ruled to the contrary in Foster v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:03 am by WIMS
Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, Case No. 11-2328. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Southern District's decision was later affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Nordwind v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Philip Thomas
An Adams County circuit court jury returned a $511,000 plaintiff verdict on Thursday in Ford v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:25 pm by Madelaine Lane
  In reaching this conclusion, the Court distinguished its holding in Monroe Beverage Co., Inc. v. [read post]