Search for: "Monroe v. Monroe" Results 461 - 480 of 1,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
There have been a two libel trials, Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB) and Hourani v Thomson [2017] EWHC 432 (QB) (decisions handed down by Warby J on the same day). [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
blog on Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters From the Law Society Gazette on Harrath v Stand for Peace From Scottish Legal News and Shoosmiths on Monroe v Hopkins   Internet and Social Media Socially Aware have published a post listing some of the most significant social media news stories from the week. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am by INFORRM
Last month, Mr Justice Warby handed down judgment in Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB), the first libel case to consider the “serious harm” test under section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 within the context of a social media post. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm by David Kopel
What kind of repeating arms were available before 1815, when the Madison-Monroe mass production innovation program began? [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J handed down a judgment dealing with permission to appeal in the case of Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 645 (QB). [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by INFORRM
Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” –… [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The recent decision of Mr Justice Warby in the High Court of Justice in Monroe v Hopkins is the latest instance of Twitter defamation. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Hopkins said that ‘no evidence of harm was produced in the court’ when Monroe was awarded £24,000 damages. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:15 am by Josh H. Escovedo
In issuing its ruling and permitting AVELA’s attempt to cancel the MARILYN MONROE trademark on the ground that it is generic, Judge Failla stated “To be clear, the court harbors serious doubts that V. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The “Twitter Libel” case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins continued to take the media law headlines this week. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:27 am by INFORRM
This is the Appendix to the Judgment in Monroe v Hopkins, handed down on 10 March 2017. [read post]