Search for: "Monroe v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2017, 10:00 am by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
Monroe, 580 F. 3d, 552, 556–57 (7th Cir. 2009) (same); United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Further, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has entered a protective order governing the production of confidential information. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
” Rather, the Medicare Secondary Payor Act expressly provides that only the United States Government, and not any private entity, may file a lawsuit in which the rights to the government are asserted. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:27 am
Monroe County Community School Corporation, 474 F.3d 477 In this 42 USC 1983 lawsuit, a teacher alleged that she was dismissed from her position because of her statement opposing the United State’s military involvement in Iraq in a social studies class. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:03 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
Iqbal, the United States Supreme Court confused the law of supervisory liability. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:50 am by SHG
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing explains decision in United States v. $167,070 in United States Currency: It begins with the flimsiest of “reasonable suspicion” and heads downhill after that. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The “Twitter Libel” case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins continued to take the media law headlines this week. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Photo News and Failed Messiah report on a New York state trial court decision handed down this week in Convers v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am by Brian Shiffrin
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 1:16 am by INFORRM
Sewell v Monroe City School Board 18-31086, a case considering an annual Medicare Health provider compensation formula, where two provisions of the law irreconcilably conflict but judges wish to construct faithfully to the text of the statute. [read post]